Contemporary management of coronary heart disease.

Coronary heart disease remains the leading cause of mortality in the UK. This review focuses on the contemporary management of patients with acute coronary syndromes and those with stable angina, including the role of primary percutaneous coronary intervention versus fibrinolytic therapy in a UK setting, current and emerging antiplatelet and anticoagulant therapies and the latest guidance on secondary prevention/lifestyle modification.

Is there a Failure to Optimize theRapy in anGina pEcToris (FORGET) study?

BACKGROUND: In the management of chronic stable angina, percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) provides symptomatic relief of angina rather than improvement of prognosis. Current guidelines recommend optimization of medical therapy prior to elective PCI. It is not clear if these guidelines are adhered to in clinical practice. AIM: The aim of this multi-centre study was to determine the extent to which these treatment guidelines are being implemented in the UK. DESIGN: This was a multi-centre study involving six hospitals in the UK. METHODS: The medical treatment and extent of risk factor modification was recorded for consecutive patients undergoing elective PCI for chronic stable angina at each site. Data collected included anti-anginal drug therapy, lipid levels and blood pressure (BP). Data on heart rate (HR) control were also collected, since this represents a fundamental part of medical anti-anginal therapy. Target HR is <60 b.p.m. for symptomatic angina. RESULTS: A total of 500 patients [74% male; mean age +/- SD (64.4 +/- 10.1 years)] were included. When considering secondary prevention, 85% were receiving a statin and 76% were on an angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitor or angiotensin receptor blocker. In terms of medical anti-ischaemic therapy, 78% were receiving beta-blockers [mean equivalent dose of bisoprolol 3.1 mg (range 1.25-20 mg)], 11% a rate limiting calcium antagonist, 35% a nitrate or nicorandil and one patient was receiving ivabradine. The mean total cholesterol (95% confidence interval) was 4.3 mmol/l (4.2-4.4), mean systolic BP of 130 +/- 24 mmHg and mean diastolic BP of 69 +/- 13 mmHg. Serum cholesterol was <5 mmol/l in 77% and <4 mmol/l in 42% of the patients, 62% of the patients had systolic BP < 140 mmHg and 92% had diastolic BP < 90 mmHg. Considering European Society of Cardiology targets, 50% had systolic BP < 130 mmHg and 76% had diastolic BP < 80 mmHg. A large proportion of patients did not achieve target resting HR; 27% of patients had a resting HR of >or=70 b.p.m., 40% had a resting HR between 60 and 69 b.p.m. and 26% had a resting HR between 50 and 59 b.p.m. The resting HR was not related to the dose of beta-blocker. CONCLUSION: A significant proportion of the patients with chronic stable angina undergoing elective PCI did not achieve therapeutic targets for lipid, BP and HR control. Over 50% of patients did not receive adequate HR lowering anti-anginal therapy to achieve recommended target resting HR.

Dyslipidemia therapy update: the importance of full lipid profile assessment.

Lipid guidelines typically focus on total cholesterol +/- low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels with less emphasis on high-density lipoprotein cholesterol (HDL-C) or triglyceride assessment, thus potentially underestimating cardiovascular (CV) risk and the need for lifestyle or treatment optimization. In this article, we highlight how reliance on isolated total cholesterol assessment may miss prognostically relevant lipid abnormalities; we describe from the European Systematic COronary Risk Evaluation (SCORE) data set how incorporation of HDL-C may improve estimation of CV risk; and, finally, we critically evaluate the evidence base surrounding triglycerides and CV risk.

Investigation of a multimarker approach to the initial assessment of patients with acute chest pain.

Early identification of acute coronary syndrome (ACS) is important to guide therapy at a time when it is most likely to be of value. In addition, predicting future risk helps identify those most likely to benefit from ongoing therapy. Cardiac troponin T (cTnT) is useful for both purposes although cannot reliably rule out ACS until 12 hours after pain onset and does not fully define future risk. In this review article we summarize our previously published research, which assessed the value of myocyte injury, vascular inflammation, hemostatic, and neurohormonal markers in the early diagnosis of ACS and risk stratification of patients with ACS. In addition to cTnT, we measured heart fatty acid binding protein (H-FABP), glycogen phosphorylase-BB, high-sensitivity C-reactive protein, myeloperoxidase, matrix metalloproteinase 9, pregnancy-associated plasma protein-A, D-dimer, soluble CD40 ligand, and N-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP). Of the 664 patients enrolled, 415 met inclusion criteria for the early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction (MI) analysis; 555 were included in the risk stratification analysis and were followed for 1 year from admission. In patients presenting <4 hours from pain onset, initial H-FABP had higher sensitivity for acute MI than cTnT (73% vs. 55%; P=0.043) but was of no benefit beyond 4 hours when compared to cTnT. On multivariate analysis, H-FABP, NT-proBNP, and peak cTnT were independent predictors of 1-year death/MI. Our research demonstrated that, in patients presenting within 4 hours from pain onset, H-FABP may improve detection of ACS. Measuring H-FABP and proBNP may help improve long-term risk stratification.

Body surface mapping improves early diagnosis of acute myocardial infarction in patients with chest pain and left bundle branch block.

OBJECTIVE: To test prospectively depolarisation and repolarisation body surface maps (BSMs) for mirror image reversal, which is less susceptible to artefact, in patients with acute ischaemic-type chest pain, and to compare these BSM criteria with previously published 12 lead ECG criteria. METHODS: An 80 lead portable BSM system was used to map patients presenting with acute ischaemic-type chest pain and a 12 lead ECG with left bundle branch block (LBBB). Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) was defined by serial cardiac enzymes. Each 12 lead ECG was assessed by the criteria of Sgarbossa et al and Hands et al for diagnosis of AMI. Depolarisation and repolarisation BSMs were assessed for loss of mirror image reversal of QRS with ST-T isointegral map patterns and a change in vector angle from QRS to ST-T outside 180+/-15 degrees -findings typically seen in LBBB with AMI. RESULTS: Of 56 patients with chest pain and LBBB, 18 had enzymatically confirmed AMI. Patients with loss of BSM image reversal were significantly more likely to have AMI (odds ratio 4.9, 95% confidence interval 1.5 to 16.4, p = 0.007). Loss of BSM image reversal was significantly more sensitive (67%) for AMI than either 12 lead ECG method (17%, 33%) albeit with some loss in specificity (BSM 71%, 12 lead ECG 87%, 97%). Patients with AMI compared with those without AMI had a greater mean change in vector angle outside the normal range (180+/-15 degrees ), particularly between QRS isointegral and ST60 isopotential (the potential 60 ms after the J point at each electrode site) BSMs (19 degrees v 9 degrees, p = 0.038). Loss of image reversal and QRS-ST60 vector change outside 180+/-15 degrees had 61% sensitivity and 82% specificity for AMI (odds ratio 7.0, 95% confidence interval 2.0 to 24.4, p = 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: BSM compared with the 12 lead ECG improved the early diagnosis of AMI in the presence of LBBB.

Impact of pre-hospital care in patients with acute myocardial infarction compared with those first managed in-hospital.

AIMS: To compare prospectively the impact of pre-hospital care by a physician-staffed mobile coronary care unit with patients managed initially in-hospital, all with acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a single centre registry of consecutive patients (n=750) admitted with acute myocardial infarction to the coronary care unit and cardiology wards of the Royal Victoria Hospital, Belfast between 1998 and 2001. For the 750 patients, in-hospital mortality was 11% and was significantly lower for those managed pre-hospital (8% vs 13%, P=0.04): patients who received fibrinolytic therapy (n=474), the in-hospital mortality was significantly lower in the pre-hospital group (7% vs 13%, P=0.02). Those managed pre-hospital had significant reduction in the median delay times (25th, 75th percentiles) from onset of symptoms to call for help 1.0 (0.5, 2.2) vs 2.0 (0.9, 6.0) h, P<0.001, from call for help to receiving fibrinolytic therapy 1.0 (0.8, 1.5) vs 1.8 (1.2, 2.5) h, P<0.001 resulting in a shorter pain-to-needle time for fibrinolytic therapy 2.3 (1.5, 3.8) vs 4.0 (2.6, 7.2) h, P<0.001. For all patients, older age, haemodynamic indicators on admission (hypotension, higher heart rate, heart failure) and managed by the in-hospital route were significant independent variables for an adverse in-hospital mortality. Although for patients aged >or=75 years no statistical significant reduction in mortality occurred for those managed pre-hospital (P=0.051), nevertheless patients in this age group first treated pre-hospital who received fibrinolytic therapy had a significantly lower mortality than those first treated in-hospital (21% vs 43%, P=0.02). CONCLUSIONS: Consecutive patients with acute myocardial infarction seen and managed initially out-of-hospital by a physician-staffed mobile coronary care unit had significantly lower in-hospital mortality.

Randomized comparison of enoxaparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction.

AIMS: To compare the efficacy and safety of low molecular weight heparin with unfractionated heparin following fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction. METHODS AND RESULTS: Three-hundred patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy following acute myocardial infarction were randomly assigned to low molecular weight heparin as enoxaparin (40 mg intravenous bolus, then 40 mg subcutaneously every 8 h, n=149) or unfractionated heparin (5000 U intravenous bolus, then 30 000 U. 24 h(-1), adjusted to an activated partial thromboplastin time 2-2.5x normal, n=151) for 4 days in conjunction with routine therapy. Clinical and therapeutic variables were analysed, in addition to use of enoxaparin or unfractionated heparin, to determine independent predictors of the 90-day composite triple end-point (death, non-fatal reinfarction, or readmission with unstable angina). The triple end-point occurred more frequently in patients receiving unfractionated heparin rather than enoxaparin (36% vs. 26%; P=0.04). Logistic regression modelling of baseline and clinical variables identified the only independent risk factors for recurrent events as left ventricular failure, hypertension, and use of unfractionated heparin rather than enoxaparin. There was no difference in major haemorrhage between those receiving enoxaparin (3%) and unfractionated heparin (4%). CONCLUSION: Use of enoxaparin compared with unfractionated heparin in patients receiving fibrinolytic therapy for acute myocardial infarction was associated with fewer recurrent cardiac events at 90 days. This benefit was independent of other important clinical and therapeutic factors.